<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: State of the Add-ons Report: May 7th</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alex.polvi.net/2008/05/07/state-of-the-add-ons-report-may-7th/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alex.polvi.net/2008/05/07/state-of-the-add-ons-report-may-7th/</link>
	<description>let's do this!!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 20:24:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Firefox 3 Add-ons compatibility update &#124; Ofseu.com</title>
		<link>http://alex.polvi.net/2008/05/07/state-of-the-add-ons-report-may-7th/comment-page-1/#comment-132935</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox 3 Add-ons compatibility update &#124; Ofseu.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 12:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alex.polvi.net/?p=222#comment-132935</guid>
		<description>[...] Polvi has posted another Firefox 3 Add-ons compatibility report, outlining the current state of the top add-ons that are not yet compatible with Firefox 3. This [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Polvi has posted another Firefox 3 Add-ons compatibility report, outlining the current state of the top add-ons that are not yet compatible with Firefox 3. This [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel H.</title>
		<link>http://alex.polvi.net/2008/05/07/state-of-the-add-ons-report-may-7th/comment-page-1/#comment-129325</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 06:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alex.polvi.net/?p=222#comment-129325</guid>
		<description>In reply to Brassen :
For Torbutton, just download the current .xpi, rename it to .zip, extract the install.rdf file, edit the MaxVersion to 3.0.* then update the zip with the modified file. Then rename to .xpi and install, it just works great. Same for FoxyProxy !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to Brassen :<br />
For Torbutton, just download the current .xpi, rename it to .zip, extract the install.rdf file, edit the MaxVersion to 3.0.* then update the zip with the modified file. Then rename to .xpi and install, it just works great. Same for FoxyProxy !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://alex.polvi.net/2008/05/07/state-of-the-add-ons-report-may-7th/comment-page-1/#comment-129180</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 10:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alex.polvi.net/?p=222#comment-129180</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just installed FF3 RC1, and browsing through the add-ons it seems most are listed as &quot;this is for an older version of Firefox&quot;.

Would it seem obvious to give the user an option (or in their user profile) to specify to only display addons for selection that are compatible with version 3.0

There are a few there that are 3.0 friendly, but it seems such a stupid idea to force users to wade through the older non-compatible stuff to find it.

1. Here&#039;s something (but you can&#039;t use it)
2. Here is another one (but yep, it&#039;s only for 2.0)
3. Look at this (but don&#039;t install - it needs to be updated).
4. This looks handy (but not for you).

If they can detect that the addons are for an older version of FF, then why not exclude them from the list to make the users job easier, and encourage the &quot;excluded authors to update&quot;??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just installed FF3 RC1, and browsing through the add-ons it seems most are listed as &#8220;this is for an older version of Firefox&#8221;.</p>
<p>Would it seem obvious to give the user an option (or in their user profile) to specify to only display addons for selection that are compatible with version 3.0</p>
<p>There are a few there that are 3.0 friendly, but it seems such a stupid idea to force users to wade through the older non-compatible stuff to find it.</p>
<p>1. Here&#8217;s something (but you can&#8217;t use it)<br />
2. Here is another one (but yep, it&#8217;s only for 2.0)<br />
3. Look at this (but don&#8217;t install &#8211; it needs to be updated).<br />
4. This looks handy (but not for you).</p>
<p>If they can detect that the addons are for an older version of FF, then why not exclude them from the list to make the users job easier, and encourage the &#8220;excluded authors to update&#8221;??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Tayra</title>
		<link>http://alex.polvi.net/2008/05/07/state-of-the-add-ons-report-may-7th/comment-page-1/#comment-128637</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Tayra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 11:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alex.polvi.net/?p=222#comment-128637</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t use FF3 without ImgLikeOpera support &lt;_&lt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t use FF3 without ImgLikeOpera support &lt;_&lt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://alex.polvi.net/2008/05/07/state-of-the-add-ons-report-may-7th/comment-page-1/#comment-128425</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 03:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alex.polvi.net/?p=222#comment-128425</guid>
		<description>There is a problem trying to load items from the sandbox (experimental) it is themes and extensions. everything that is out of the sandbox installs fine. Is this a bug or a security issue???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a problem trying to load items from the sandbox (experimental) it is themes and extensions. everything that is out of the sandbox installs fine. Is this a bug or a security issue???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevb</title>
		<link>http://alex.polvi.net/2008/05/07/state-of-the-add-ons-report-may-7th/comment-page-1/#comment-128402</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 23:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alex.polvi.net/?p=222#comment-128402</guid>
		<description>I have used the Winamp Toolbar and RealPlayer Browser Record Plug In but haven&#039;t seen FF3 compatible versions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used the Winamp Toolbar and RealPlayer Browser Record Plug In but haven&#8217;t seen FF3 compatible versions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riccardo Galli</title>
		<link>http://alex.polvi.net/2008/05/07/state-of-the-add-ons-report-may-7th/comment-page-1/#comment-128377</link>
		<dc:creator>Riccardo Galli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 18:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alex.polvi.net/?p=222#comment-128377</guid>
		<description>I think 
View Source Chart
is an addon to mention (&quot;Draws a Color-Coded Chart of a Webpage&#039;s Source Code&quot;)

https://addons.mozilla.org/it/firefox/addon/655

Has anyone news about it ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think<br />
View Source Chart<br />
is an addon to mention (&#8220;Draws a Color-Coded Chart of a Webpage&#8217;s Source Code&#8221;)</p>
<p><a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/it/firefox/addon/655" rel="nofollow">https://addons.mozilla.org/it/firefox/addon/655</a></p>
<p>Has anyone news about it ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cougar</title>
		<link>http://alex.polvi.net/2008/05/07/state-of-the-add-ons-report-may-7th/comment-page-1/#comment-128375</link>
		<dc:creator>Cougar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 17:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alex.polvi.net/?p=222#comment-128375</guid>
		<description>About MinimizeToTray - 2.0.0.*, there is another extension implementing same functionality (i found it while searching for an minimizetotray alternative that worked with the ff beta):
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/5462

It is still in the &quot;sandbox&quot; and is marked as beta5pre but it works great with beta5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About MinimizeToTray &#8211; 2.0.0.*, there is another extension implementing same functionality (i found it while searching for an minimizetotray alternative that worked with the ff beta):<br />
<a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/5462" rel="nofollow">https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/5462</a></p>
<p>It is still in the &#8220;sandbox&#8221; and is marked as beta5pre but it works great with beta5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KeKc</title>
		<link>http://alex.polvi.net/2008/05/07/state-of-the-add-ons-report-may-7th/comment-page-1/#comment-128372</link>
		<dc:creator>KeKc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 16:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alex.polvi.net/?p=222#comment-128372</guid>
		<description>I like imgLikeOpera also!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like imgLikeOpera also!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brassen</title>
		<link>http://alex.polvi.net/2008/05/07/state-of-the-add-ons-report-may-7th/comment-page-1/#comment-128360</link>
		<dc:creator>Brassen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 14:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alex.polvi.net/?p=222#comment-128360</guid>
		<description>What about Torbutton?

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about Torbutton?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
